The LATimes has a story up today showing how Bill Clinton uses his foundation to accept contributions from politically risky sources. http://www.latimes.com/...
Obvious problem: What favors do these donors want in return--if Hillary gets the presidency?
I think the story shows Billery isn't "vetted" at all-- a laughable claim, given the Clinton modus operandi in, say, given the unresolved circumstances of the pardons, and the frenetic fundraising for the Foundation and the Library. Since the Clintons are self-advertised "2-fers," the story illustates the possible conflicts of interest in Bill's fund-raising activities and a third Clinton term.
The slow-drip for this subject may be starting. (I hope it is--wish it were faster than a slow-drip.) We all remember the uranium deal. http://www.nytimes.com/... Specifics of the new episode below the fold.